Metalforever discusses her theory on limits.
Psychokinetic Limitation Theory
(By: Metalforever)
June, 2008
-Opening-
This theory began its life not in article form, but as a simple excerpt. I became so interested with the topic that it was explored further. I hope the experimental work that I pursued was just as educational to me as this article will be to you. It was written knowing that the information contained within is highly controversial, and as such, is open to anyone willing to voice an opinion. One day I hope that the individual reading this will be the one to help me expand on the information presented, or at least be able to add it to his/her knowledge, and apply my thoughts to his/her practice sessions.
I begin this theory discussing the master variables, Time (T), The Self (S) and The Environment (E), and how they contribute to the limitation of one’s ability.
I. Time
Like any ability one has to practice to achieve, time has a major bearing on what one can or cannot do with Psychokinesis. If time was infinite, we probably could do close to anything with this ability. However, since our time is limited, both by external and internal forces, there exists a barrier; a variable in which influences what each individual can or cannot do.
Take two different individuals for instance. Lets assume in this primary example that said individuals inherited the same genes as far as psychokinetic ability is involved, and both are susceptible to the same environment. Therefore, lets assume the variables influencing the ability to to psychokinesis involving the self and the environment are equal. In this primary example, the first individual lives for 60 years and dies due to a car accident. The second individual lives to be 84 and dies of old age. The first individual has a full time job, and as such, only has fifteen minutes a day, two days a week to practice psychokinesis. The second individual only has a part-time job, and no family. Thus, the second individual is able to focus on psychokinesis for thirty minutes every morning. As a result, the first individual, with equal variables involving the self and the environment, in relation to psychokinetic ability, to the second individual, receives less experience. Having less experience, and less practice time, individual one does not develop as much as individual two, leaving individual two not only with more skill, but also the ability to be better able to teach. Obviously, time is a factor. This factor has a great influence involving how far an individual may or may not get involving psychokinesis.
II. The Self
Another limiting factor when considering Psychokinetic ability is the self. The self in this context can be defined as all of the factors that define you in relation to Psychokinesis. Therefore, this means the self includes factors such as your personality, biological makeup, how much time you optionally dedicate to practice, and how you choose to practice.
When considering the personality, in relation to the limiting factors of Psychokinesis, someone that maintains a stubborn personality might have a harder time achieving success due to a willingness to do things a certain way (which may be incorrect, or lead to undesirable habits), or who refuses to try certain exercises when asked. Due to the fact that personality does attribute to if, how and when someone practices, personality is obviously a factor that leads to how far one may contribute him/herself to learning the ability. Personality is not always a hindrance. For example, someone that has a personality that contributes to working hard to achieve a goal might feel at home with the ability. In this case, the personality contributes positively to the success of the individual, and also the development of the ability.
When one takes the time to consider the biological makeup of an individual, one must also consider how this contributes to how well and efficiently, biologically, a certain individual has the ability to accomplish a certain task. Does said individual have a natural ability to be able to relay the intended message to the subconscious, in an attempt to bring about physical change? Or does the individual not have this gene, which causes a hindrance in how well said individual may perform when faced with the ability, and everything required to obtain and maintain it. It must also be noted, that when referring to the biological makeup of an individual, that is not to say that there is any one “psi gene”, but rather, normal genes and traits that hinder or enhance one’s potential to perform well at a certain ability.
One must also not forget to consider how much time an individual optionally decides to contribute to practice, which, depending on the variable time(t),and the variable environment(e), ranges from once or twice a year, to every day for one or more hours. How much time an individual optionally decides to contribute to practice one must understand is less of a factor of the variable time(t), when speaking of how it relates to the self, but more of a factor of how much time the individual perceives that he/she should practice.
Furthermore, when considering how the self contributes to the limit of psychokinetic ability, one must also take time to consider how an individual chooses to practice. For example, lets assume two different individuals obtain the same amount of practice (T), and are exposed to the same environment (E), however, the first individual chooses to practice Psychokinesis in a way that is detrimental to success, such as practicing for hours without a break. Lets assume individual two practices with frequent breaks. Individual one becomes all worn out due to nonstop practice, and becomes unable to devote practice in the following days due to having hurt him/herself. Individual two allowed for frequent breaks, thus did not hurt him/herself practicing, and is able to practice the next day without complication. Obviously the first individual, because of suffering injury, is worse off than individual two, making how you choose to practice an obvious factor. How you choose to practice being a factor, however, does not have to attribute to practicing without breaks. Other attributing factors when one considers “how” an individual chooses to practice may include scenarios such as, is the individual using the method that is the most efficient to him or her? Is said individual incorporating other exercises, such as Meditation, to supplement his or her psionic practice? Obviously, there are countless attributing factors when considering this variable.
III. The Environment
After considering the self (S), and time (T) as possible contributors to the limiting of a certain ability, one must also take time to observe the effects of the environment (E). The environment in this context includes everything that occurs outside of the self, but does not include time. Environmental factors can be defined as contributors to the detriment of the maximum ability’s potential (M) of a certain individual that does not involve the variable T, or the variable S. When considering an individual’s environment, in relation to the limits of Psychokinesis, one must take into account the degree in which an individual who is trying to practice is disturbed, which includes factors such as whether an electronic is operating (That is of course to say that assumed individual is bothered by the noise of a radio or a television), whether an individual’s peers are watching and said individual is nervous about the presence of other human being when practicing, and even whether the individual in question is currently involved in an argument with others around him/her.
As an individual with a trained eye might notice, the environmental variable contributing to the limits of an ability such as Psychokinesis is large, and contains many smaller, individual variables within it. The environmental variable one may compare to a category, and all of the smaller variables within it a subcategory, where every smaller variable affects the whole. When taking into account the effects of the environment on Psychokinetic ability, one must also assume the factors in which said individual is affected by. That is to say, while one individual’s productivity is hindered by the simple playing of a song, another individual may be unaffected. This means that there is a separate factor from within the environmental variable that contributes to the detriment of an individual’s maximum psychokinetic potential (M). A separate variable that occurs within a larger variable, for the sake of simplicity, we will refer to as a sub variable. So when considering the amount in which one individual is affected by a certain event or action, in relation to another individual or to the cultural norm, we will refer to as a sub variable, which contributes to the larger variable, the environmental variable.
In our example, the sub variables mentioned were whether an individual’s concentration is affected by a simple song, whether an individual’s mood affects psychokinetic output in the case of an argument, whether said output is positive or negative, and whether an individual becomes nervous when watched by other individuals, and if that negatively or positively affects said individuals ability to perform psychokinesis efficiently.
Take time to consider another example. Lets refer to a comparison of two separate individuals when exposed to separate scenarios once more, for the sake of simplicity. The first individual is involved in an environment that contributes positively to the advancement of his/her ability. This individual’s environment included sub variables all tilt in favor of said individuals advancement. What this means is no argument is taking place, no music is being played, and no events are happening that cause a general disturbance in the individuals ability to accurately perceive the object, or the ability to efficiently practice. Since this individual is not being disturbed during psychokinetic practice, he/she has a successful practice, without disturbance. The second individual had just completed an argument, and then tries to practice to relieve him/herself. This individual is so wrapped up in the specifics of the environment, that he/she does not focus at the task at hand, thus resulting in an unsuccessful practice. Obviously, the environment plays a factor when considering the limits in psychokinesis.
IV. Tying it All Together
After observing how the variables E(Environment), T (Time) and S (Self) affect how one is limited in psychokinesis individually, one must stop to consider how every variable together affects how much an individual is limited in psychokinesis as a whole. One must understand that an individual is constantly being affected by all three limiting factors, during every moment. Since any particular individual at any given time is manipulating/being manipulated by all three limiting factors, one must take into account that an individual’s limits regarding psychokinetic ability, or any other ability, is constantly changing. Since an individual’s limits regarding a certain ability is always changing, so is an individual’s maximum psychokinetic potential (M). Theoretically, this means that it is possible, that any individual, at any given time may increase their maximum psychokinetic potential (M), by manipulating any of the three limiting factors. First we turn to time.
A. Increasing the Maximum Psychokinetic Potential of Time
Since time is not easily manipulated, we turn to other sub variables that affect the category as a whole, specifically, how much time a day any individual can possibly practice in that day, and remain healthy. By finding this, an individual can more strategically plan out practice time in an attempt to bring about greater psychokinetic output. Creating more time for psychokinesis practice is obviously also an option. Of course factors and sub variables affecting time, or any one of the three limiting factors, change on a per-case basis, therefore time may, and probably will not simply be limited to the concrete sense of the word, or how much an individual is able to possible practice in any given day.
Consider this example, in which we return to the comparison of two individuals. The first individual practices aimlessly for varying amounts of time each day, because of various unplanned events, and other scenarios. Individual one also only wishes to practice after all other tasks are completed. Individual two decides on creating a structured schedule. This schedule not only organizes daily events, but also leaves various practice times for psionics, in an orderly manner. Individual two also decides that psionics should not only be practiced when sitting down at his/her house, but should also be practiced any time he/she has a free moment, such as extra time when waiting for a ride, waiting for a friend or right before leaving work. Obviously, individual two creates more time in a healthy manner to successfully practice, increasing his/her maximum psychokinetic potential. Next, we stop to consider the second limiting factor, the self.
B. Finding and Increasing the Maximum Psychokinetic Potential of the Self
When observing all of the variables and sub variables that compose the self, in a context that relates to increasing one’s maximum psychokinetic potential (M), it is important to take a second look at the sub variables, and how they relate to the master variable, the self. For our example, we will use the sub variables as outlined above, such as an individuals personality(I), biological makeup(B), how much time one optionally decides to dedicate to practice(t), and how one chooses to practice(H). Since we cannot directly alter an individuals personality, or one’s biological makeup, we turn to variable t and variable H. When taking a look at how much time one optionally decides to dedicate to practice(t), and how one chooses to practice(H), in an attempt to relate said variables to the master variable, it is important to realize that each sub variable together composes the self.
When observing sub variable t, one must first realize that for an individual to figure out how much he/she should optionally dedicate to practice, in an attempt to increase maximum psychokinetic potential, he/she must dedicate time to realizing what composes a practice session, and how to get the most out of one. Two very important variables that compose a practice session are practice and breaks.
When experimenting with variable t and practice sessions, it would be optimal for the individual to find a few things. The first thing an individual should find is how long he/she is able to practice before exhaustion for the day (E). The next is to experiment with various practice times(t), to figure out how long of a break he/she is most comfortable with (b). Finally, the individual should take into account HOW he/she should optimally decide to use such a break(D).
It is when variable E is closest to variable t that the individual is at his/her maximum psychokinetic potential for sub variable t. It is important to note that how long an individual is able to practice before exhaustion for the day may vary greatly over a longer period of time of constant practice, and variable t should be adjusted. Therefore, if one is looking to achieve his/her maximum psychokinetic potential for variable t over a longer period of time, he/she should adjust how much time he/she optionally decides to dedicate to practice at least once a month.
When the trained eye observes variable b, which is how much of a break an individual is most comfortable with, and variable D, which is HOW a certain individual decides to use such a break, he/she sees yet another relationship. If one is looking to increase maximum psychokinetic potential for the self, another advisable goal is to find the most efficient mode of taking a break(variable D) for the amount of time in which an individual decides to contribute to a break ( variable b). Finding the most efficient mode of taking a break depends on the length of a break, and greatly on the individual him/herself. One should try many different ways of taking a break to see which one is the most efficient, most comfortable, and which one performs with the most psychokinetic output within the desired time frame.
Let us return to the comparison of two individuals once more to illustrate the time before exhaustion(E) and how much time one optionally decides to dedicate to practice scenario. Individual one in our example decides to practice without any regards to how much he/she could be practicing before exhaustion, but instead chooses to end practice after one hour and two breaks. Individual two in our example experimented with variable t in regards to his/her practice. Upon experimenting, individual two had decided the he/she may practice 2.5 hours in a day with a total of 6 breaks and receive the highest possible psychokinetic output for that particular day. Both individuals aimed to increase their maximum psychokinetic output, the first one by increasing practice time from 30 minutes to one hour, and the second by performing the variable t experiment and following through with the results. Which individual do you think increased his/her maximum psychokinetic potential(M), the most? After considering sub variable t, let us not forget about sub variable H, how one chooses to practice.
How one chooses to practice involves everything relating to methodology, and includes everything up to how an individual chooses to supplement his/her practice. Does the individual choose to supplement his/her practice with a healthy meal, and by meditating? Does said individual benefit from meditation or a healthy meal before practice? One way to increase an individual’s maximum psychokinetic potential in relation to sub variable H is to experiment, to see which supplements help, and which supplements are detrimental. When one chooses how to practice, and actually has a practice session, does one method work better than another? Is said individual using a predefined method? Is the individual using no method at all? The only way to find the most efficient method for any individual is to experiment, perhaps even with self-created methods. After all, it is mostly likely the subconscious in which the individual is trying to get the point across, and what better way to get the point across than to use a method that appeals only to you? After considering all variables and sub variables of the self, it is now time to turn our attention to the environment.
C. Increasing Maximum Psychokinetic Potential of the Environmental Variable
When attempting to increase an individuals maximum psychokinetic potential when considering variable E, it is important to note that the subvariables involving the environment are different for each and every individual, depending on personal circumstances. It’s also important to note that sub variables involving the environment vary with dependence on what the person in question wishes to calculate. For example, an individual wishing to increase his/her maximum psychokinetic potential in the now would feel more at home considering limiting factors such as whether the individual had just engaged in an argument(A), the degree in which said individual is currently being disturbed(d), or whether said individual’s peers are watching(P). Someone who is wishes to calculate long term maximum psychokinetic potential in terms of the environment, should be focusing on sub variables such as whether the individual’s practice environment is always a loud environment(L), whether he/she has a steady, flat surface to practice on(F), and whether his/her family, friends or acquaintances agree with what he/she is doing(a).
1. Understanding Second and Third-Level Sub Variables(Short-Term Environmental Factors)
In either situation, when considering variable E, since it is so complex, we must also consider second and third-level variables that compose the various sub variables in which we are trying to calculate for. In this example, when calculating for various limiting factors of a certain environment in the now, there are sub variables A (argument), d (disturbance), and p (people watching).
When considering variable A, whether the individual has just engaged in an argument, its important to note that there are even more variables that define it. Is the individual’s temperament affected by said argument(second-level sub variable)? Also when considering sub variable d, which is the degree in which said individual is currently being disturbed, one also has to consider its sub variables, which includes factors such as whether an electronic is operating (second-level sub variable) (That is of course to say that assumed individual is bothered by the noise of a radio or a television [third-level sub variable]). When considering sub variable p, which is whether an individual’s peers are watching, we have to consider whether the individual is nervous about the presence of other human being(s) when practicing(second-level sub variable),and does this nervousness affect said individual’s psychokinetic output(third-level sub variable)? One must consider whether said individuals watching have a positive, negative or neutral view towards psionics and psychokinesis(second-level sub variable). We also must consider that if said individuals that are watching, are they subconsciously projecting a positive or negative view of movement unto the object(third-level sub variable)?
2. Understanding Second and Third-Level Sub Variables(Long-Term Environmental Factors)
After considering short-term environmental factors in detail, it is important that one also gains an understanding concerning second and third-level sub variables that affect long-term psychokinetic output. As far as the long-term is concerned, in the example, possible limiting factors include whether there is a long-term loud practice environment(such as whether a certain individual lives with loud family members)[sub variable L], whether there is a flat surface to practice on (sub variable F), and whether said individual’s acquaintances are accepting of that person practicing psionics (sub variable a). When one stops to consider sub variable L, one notices that a second-level sub variable exists, which is whether said individual’s acquaintances being accepting or not of psionics affects this individual’s ability to perform psionics(second-level sub variable). Next, one may stop to consider sub variable F, which is whether there is a flat surface to practice on. When observing sub variable F’s properties, one may notice that sub variable F also includes more sub variables that define it. The sub variables that define it(in this example) are possible limiting factors such as whether the object of practice(psiwheel, pen, or what have you) actually needs a flat surface to practice on (second-level sub variable), and, if so, does not having a flat surface to practice on decrease psychokinetic output (third-level sub variable)? After stopping to consider sub variable F, one must also stop to consider sub variable a, which is whether said individual’s acquaintances are accepting of him/her practicing psionics. When considering sub variable a, one must understand that there are also possible limiting factors that define it, such as whether said acquaintances being accepting or not of psionics affects an individual’s ability to perform the abilities (second-level sub variable).
3. Non-Factors
One must understand that when considering second and third-level sub variables, that if a third-level sub variable is null, for example, if there is electronics in the room(second-level sub variable), but the individual is not affected or bothered by said electronics, the second-level sub variable becomes a non-factor. It exists as a second-level sub variable, but ceases to exist as a limiting factor. One must also understand that for a second-level sub variable to be a non-factor, ALL third-level sub variables must be null. This same reasoning applies to second-level sub variables in relation to regular sub variables. All regular variables( time, the self, and the environment), however, ALWAYS have limiting factors that affect them.
4 . Increasing Maximum Psychokinetic Potential in Relation to Sub Variable A
First, we stop to consider sub variable A, whether the individual has just engaged in an argument. For this example, sub variable A includes other sub variables within it, such as whether an individual’s temperament is affected by said argument(second-level sub variable), and whether said individual’s temperament being affected decreases or does not affect psychokinetic output (third-level sub variable), For this example, we are going to assume that the individual in question has just in fact engaged in argument with a family member. This individual decides to take his/her mind off of the argument by practicing psychokinesis, however his/her practice does not go well. Assuming there is nothing else attributing to said practice not going as planned, one must return to Sub Variable A’s second and third-level sub variables. Since psychokinetic output was affected, the third-level sub variable in this situation is obviously a limiting factor, which means that the individual was in fact affected by the argument(second-level sub variable). If an individual seeks to increase variable M, his maximum psychokinetic potential, in relation to sub variable A, it is important to first be certain concerning all of the second and third-level sub variables that affect it. In our example, one must first turn his/her attention to the second-level subvariable (It also affects the third), which in the example, obviously was a limiting factor. To increase one’s maximum psychokinetic potential in relation to this variable, one must understand what makes it a limiting factor in the first place. For an individual to be affected by an argument, an argument had to have first taken place. One possible option is to avoid argument altogether, or to resolve to end argument on a good stance every single time it occurs. Another option in this case is that if an argument does occur, and it still ends on a negative stance, is to take one’s mind off of said argument. This is possible by either not practicing at all for the time being(though this is not solving any problems if one is looking to increase maximum psychokinetic potential), or to meditate before practice, if one still wishes to get practice in after the argument occurs. Other options include determining what makes one relaxed, determining how to best be able to get one’s mind off of the event in question, or even resolving the argument. Perhaps it is even possible to get one’s mind off of the negative argument by taking a walk to organize thoughts. One may be comfortable experimenting with this to see what helps the best. Next, we turn to sub variable d.
5. Increasing Maximum Psychokinetic Potential in Relation to Temporary Disturbance
We next stop to consider sub variable d, which is the degree in which a certain individual is being disturbed. When considering sub variable d, we must also stop to consider all of the sub variables in our example that compose it. For this example, we are only considering whether an electronic is operating (second-level sub variable) and whether the individual is being bothered by the noise of the electronic(third-level sub variable), which, in this example, we are going to assume affects psychokinetic output. Even though there will probably be more sub variables in most cases (and therefore more limiting factors), the information is being presented limitedly for the sake of understanding. For this case, lets assume that the individual in question has electronics operating and is bothered by said electronics, therefore his/her psychokinetic output is decreased. In this example, both the second and third-level sub variables are limiting factors. First, we observe the second-level sub variable, which is whether an electronic is operating. It is possible to increase the maximum psychokinetic potential of this variable in many ways. First, one may simply turn off the electronic in the example, which eliminates the possibility of decreasing one’s maximum psychokinetic potential (M). But, say this is not possible. Perhaps other individuals (who happen to have authority), are using said electronic, therefore it must remain on. One option is to not practice at all (which is not helping one increase his/her maximum psychokinetic potential, obviously). Other options include practicing in a different location, away from the disturbance in question, or even turning on music to drown out the noise, but that of course assumes that the individual is not affected negatively by the playing of music After observing th sub variable d, we turn our attention to whether an individual is being watched.
6. Increasing Maximum Psychokinetic Potential in Relation to Sub Variable P
After considering sub variable d, we stop to consider sub variable P, which is whether an individual is being watched by others. When considering sub variable P, it is important to also make note of whether the individual is nervous about the presence of other human being(s) when practicing(second-level sub variable),whether this nervousness affects said individual’s psychokinetic output(third-level sub variable)? One must consider whether said individuals watching have a positive, negative or neutral view towards psionics and psychokinesis(second-level sub variable). We also must consider that if said individuals that are watching, are they subconsciously projecting a positive or negative view of movement onto the object(third-level sub variable)? In this example, lets assume the individual is affected by all of the above variables, therefore all sub variables become limiting factors. When stopping to consider how one may increase his/her maximum psychokinetic potential in relation to sub variable P, we first stop to consider the first second-level sub variable, which is whether an individual is nervous about the presence of other human being(s) when practice. This is of course to assume that an individual’s psychokinetic output is affected negatively by being nervous. In this case, one may increase his/her maximum psychokinetic potential by telling said individuals to go away (this is to assume that they actually listen), or even to practice under conditions where others are watching until one is no longer negatively affected by this presence. Other options include simply moving to a different area where other individuals are not observing, or choosing to practice at a later time (This of course does not increase one’s maximum psychokinetic potential [M]). After stopping to consider this second-level sub variable, one may also stop to consider whether the individuals observing have a positive, negative, or neutral view concerning psionics (This is of course to assume that individual’s are projecting this view on the object in question). The solutions for both situations are similar, and one may refer to the first second-level sub variable for information on how to increase variable M. This of course excludes the solution involving one practicing under said nervous conditions, because this does not stop the individuals observing from projecting their view on the object in question.
7. Increasing Maximum Psychokinetic Potential in Relation to Long-Term Disturbance
Next, we stop to consider sub variable L, which is whether individual’s practice environment is always a loud environment. The second-level sub variable in our example, when considering sub variable L is whether having a loud long-term practice environment affects the individual’s ability to perform psionics (second-level sub variable). One looking to increase variable M would be interested in experimenting with how much exactly certain loud environmental factors negatively affect one’s psychokinetic output. It is only after experimenting that one is able to accurately increase his/her psychokinetic potential in relation to long-term disturbance. Increasing this maximum potential of an individual in relation to this sub variable may be less of a factor of trying to lesson the long-term disturbance (because of the lack of malleability of long-term factors), and more of a factor where once experiments how he/she can alternately cancel out said negative effects with other actions. For example, if one has loud family members, it is possible to temporarily bring about action or confrontation so that said family members are quiet long enough for a practice session. For example, it is possible to occupy said family members with another activity. It may also be possible to “drown out” a long term disturbance with music, however, one has to be especially cautious when considering this solution, due to the fact some individuals may be negatively affected my music. More experimentation regarding this solution is recommended, along with experiments put into affect to come up with one’s own solution.
8. Understanding Variable M in Terms of Long-Term Sub Variable F
After considering long-term disturbance, it is important to note that in our example, we consider sub variable F, which is whether the individual in question has a flat surface to practice one. Sub variable F also includes whether the object of practice requires a flat surface (second-level sub variable), and if so does not having a flat surface to practice on decrease psychokinetic output (third-level sub variable)? For this example we are assuming that the individual in question does not have a flat surface to practice on, his/her object of practice requires it, and his/her psychokinetic output is lessoned as a result. When observing sub variable F, one has many options. It is possible to simply buy a flat surface to practice on, or create one. Under the circumstance that this is not possible, another solution may simply be to find an object that does not require a flat surface to practice on (such as a wall-hanging pendulum), or to even practice at someone else’s house, or outside on the sidewalk. In this case, one may be better off with the earlier solution, as practicing on a place like the sidewalk probably decreases psychokinetic output just as much as not having a flat surface to practice on might.
9. Understanding Variable M in Terms of Sub Variable a
Finally, we stop to consider sub variable a, which is whether an individual’s family, friends or acquaintances agree with what he/she is doing. In this case, we also must consider whether said acquaintances being accepting or not of psionics affects an individual’s ability to perform the ability in question (second-level sub variable). In our example, we are assuming that the individual in question’s family is not accepting of psionics, therefore variable M is negatively affected. When observing variable a, it is important to make note that when trying to increase one’s maximum psychokinetic potential (M) that one may either get his/her unaccepting acquaintance to agree with what he/she is doing, or just do psionics under any circumstance, whether the unaccepting individual is under the position to care or otherwise. One must understand that sub variable a is a large factor in terms of variable M because if an acquaintance is unaccepting, and does not allow an individual to practice psionics in the presence of him/her, said individual must practice in secret, or choose not to practice at all, therefore affectedly decreasing his/her maximum psychokinetic potential indefinitely. When practicing in secret is considered, it is important to note that one is unable to practice in ways that reveal he/she is practicing, therefore this limits that individual to practice things that do not include scenarios that are obvious, such as hanging a key attached to a string on a ceiling, in attempt to move it. It is because of this that one’s ability may be hindered, along with one’s maximum psychokinetic potential. Of course, those wishing to practice in secret are limited in other ways.
10. Applying the Environmental Variable to an Individual Scenario
Since an individual’s environment(E) is constantly changing, so are the limiting factors that negatively influence it. As a result, it is impossible to discuss all factors related to every persons individual environment. To more accurately be able to gauge which limiting factors influence any one person, one must first make note of all of the short term factors in which one is emotionally affected by ( sub variable), and also all factors that hinder accurately being able to practice (sub variable). It is through this that one is able to determine the each second and third-level limiting factor that is involved. When observing long term factors, it is currently advisable to experiment with possible limiting factors (such as having a loud family, or a television constantly on), and their sub variables. It is through experimentation that one is best able to determine whether factors such as a television on negatively affect an individual’s practice output. It is after identifying definite problems that one is better able to find a solution, thus increasing one’s maximum psychokinetic potential. The purpose of the above section is to illustrate examples with possible solutions, so that any one individual is better able to map out limiting factors of his/her own, in an attempt to bring about his/her own solutions.
V.Closing
It is when one identifies his/her limits, and their solutions, that he/she can more effectively grow in regards to ability in practice. This article was written with the hopes that one would take the information I presented, and apply it to his/her psionic practice. I encourage everyone currently practicing to take the information contained here, and use it not primarily as theory or knowledge, but search through it with the Intent on application. Open contributions are heavily encouraged.
(metalforever, 2008)