Improvement on attacks

Why are you disrupting people's energy system?

This community don't condone this behavior. Actually, majority of communities in the OEC don't condone this behavior. Why? Because it's rude and very irresponsible. You know what you are doing is a reverse for of an overload? Vamping is disrupting one's energetic system. An overload does the same. However, one is from excessive information, and one is from energetic disturbance, like vamping.

Hmmm, I have tried psi vamping once a few months ago. Your body responds negatively towards it if you absorb the energy. I remember that my esophagus kept feeling like someone was grabbing it firmly whenever I directed the energy there. If I directed it somewhere else, it would feel really tight and like pressure.

To nev

1) I have respect of the communities and would do nothing to mis represent them if this is mis representing of or just giving psionics or psionics online a bad name I will stop immediately and not post of it again. I'm sersiously a person who likes to respect others.

2) I agree 100% that it is rude and bad if the person is unknowing and unwilling. But this was the total opposite case he actually wanted me to use it on him after I had told him I'd finally made one ( I did protest) he was willing and knew the effects of the attack.

Calling me rude and irresponsible was unnecessary to get your point across, because I would never do this to the unknowing it's against everything I was raised to do. It was a one time thing and it probably wont happen again.

3) I know what a vamp and overload does I didnt vamp his energy into myself only into the construct, the construct was active for only 30 seconds before I terminated it. It was just to show him it worked and he was the one who asked it to be done.

So basically I said I wont post this on the fourms again if it's offensive, and that I think that I was not being rude nor irresponsible, and I don't appreciate accusations.

I think I worded this in a non offensive, way if it came off as offending then know it was not meant.

-SecondComing-

other then the whole ethics thing, i'm a little worried about your validation, no offence.

the thing is, if he already knew the effects, and was eager for you to try it on him, it may have been his own expectation that created the effects and not the construct at all. you'd need to try it on him, with consent, but without him knowing what the effects are.

but that just deepends the ethics issue

Corpse, you might have triggered someone's self-defense mechanism... I've been strangled from triggering self-defense mechanisms... however, I will not go into that.

Sorry, I didn't know he wanted you to do this. Just we try to keep people away from advocating this kind of stuff. Simply because if you don't know what you are doing, you can damage one's energetic system. So, you have to be careful.

I understand, thats why I was hesitant and protesting.

I admit that I should have just refused. Thanks for the warning and I will make sure to be very careful or simply not do it.

Thanks man.
-Second Coming-

Well, you can talk about YOUR progress in your blogs as long as there is a warning label and all that goodies.

As Neveza stated, It would always be a good idea to have consent from your subject before hand.

However, On a second note... Nice progress, Id like to see this in our practices. Look forward to it!

Yeah! GO YOU!

You have made a step that many people would be very unwilling to take, you vamped someone with your construct.

Even though that's kinda a bad thing but it's ok you were just experimenting with your construct that you just made and that is totally understandable. If you ever do hurt someone's energy system though it's always nice to try and heal it for them.

I also think why you can't get your construct to work on people that you can't see is maybe because you're just a more visual person. Try concentrating on the movement of your construct and guide it toward the person that should work.