Submitted by metalforever on Mon, 09/08/2008 - 22:23
0
votes
+
Vote up!
-
Vote down!
I had these ideaa during class today. Here\'s how it goes:
If you could use precog/RV (assuming you were absolutely amazing at it) to find the answer to a question on a test by precog/RVing into the future when you search the answer on the internet.
OR
(This one is quite a strech) Send back the answer to the question to the past, when you were taking the test. This one is really confusing. I figure if you can RV infinite distances and time, then there has to be an information exchange between you and what you\'re RVing. If that\'s true, then couldn\'t the receiver send information to what him/her is RVing? Like remote presence in a different time. Then if that\'s true, then you could use TP to tell yourself the answer. So then what would happen is that you would feel like nothing happened, because if you changed the past, you change the future, and therefore don\'t remember yourself ever putting in a wrong (uneducated) answer, you would only remember yourself telling yourself to put in a certain answer. But then if that happened, then you\'d have no reason to change the past by telling yourself the answer at all! And therefore, wouldn\'t have done it! And therefore would have gotten it wrong! In which case you would have gone back and told yourself the answer! In which case you get into a loop of getting it right and getting it wrong!! WHAT WOULD HAPPEN!?
Permalink Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 09/09/2008 - 21:57
Seems to me that it\'d create an infinite loop of doing itself than undoing itself. (i.e. getting it wrong, getting it right, etc)
I don\'t think we can say anything more than what we\'ve all already said. We simply don\'t know enough about it!
But, what we can do is have someone precog some mathamatical event in the future, say, a math problem they have to solve the next day. They don\'t know how to do it. They precog while doing the problem in the future when you learn how to do the problem, after THAT SELF got it wrong. So now, we have 2 universes, one we can control, and one we can\'t. One gets it wrong, one gets it right. We want the controled on to get it right, and let the other universe to get it wrong.
Sounds plausible to me.
And it seems simple enough, too! With the newly aquired knowledge of quantum theory, we can say that we are indeed communicating with ourselves in another universe.
The only problem I see is the person has to be amazing at precog, and I hear it\'s really hard to get out numbers in precog and RV.
...that was crazy!
...that was crazy!
Seems to me that it\'d create
Seems to me that it\'d create an infinite loop of doing itself than undoing itself. (i.e. getting it wrong, getting it right, etc)
I don\'t think we can say anything more than what we\'ve all already said. We simply don\'t know enough about it!
But, what we can do is have someone precog some mathamatical event in the future, say, a math problem they have to solve the next day. They don\'t know how to do it. They precog while doing the problem in the future when you learn how to do the problem, after THAT SELF got it wrong. So now, we have 2 universes, one we can control, and one we can\'t. One gets it wrong, one gets it right. We want the controled on to get it right, and let the other universe to get it wrong.
Sounds plausible to me.
And it seems simple enough, too! With the newly aquired knowledge of quantum theory, we can say that we are indeed communicating with ourselves in another universe.
The only problem I see is the person has to be amazing at precog, and I hear it\'s really hard to get out numbers in precog and RV.
What do you think, redefine?
About the MWI, I was saying
About the MWI, I was saying there were some where you get it wrong, some where you get it right, regardless of other variables.
I\'d be really interested to do some experiments in the future (get it?).
I have a question, though. Can remote presence be in a different time, and can it affect the enviroment?
Add new comment