Possible

You are here

6 posts / 0 new
Last post
Possible
0 votes
+
Vote up!
-
Vote down!

In theory it is possible to control psi around you since thought controls psi.

Re: Possible

If thought controls psi, you can control psi around you. This is what I like to call ambient/free Psi, anyone can use it. It is the excess psi that all physical things release. While this form of psi is easy to obtain, it isn't nesicarially 'pure'. It may be harder to manipulate, based on hundreds of different factors, most common being it is fresh psi that hasn't had time to lose it's energy signature, or it is within the field of another entity, usually a person.

Now, while you can (sometimes) easily control this energy, you can't use it very efficiently unless you make it yours. You can do this in many ways, but some useful ways are to bind your energy signature to it, or allowing it to filter through your body, incorporating it into your own energy system.

If you are trying to take energy from another person, this can be VERY hard, as you are forced to take energy that already belongs to someone else. The difficulty has varying levels depending on a person's personality, physical energy levels, emotions, whether or not they are a psion, and whether or not they know that you are trying to take their energy. If they are willing, this becomes a lot easier.

Re: Possible

Kind of an old topic to reply to don't you think, i don't think this person is even active anymore. However;

[quote="Sylar"]
In theory it is possible to control psi around you since thought controls psi.
[/quote]

Yet if you know not it's nature, your efforts are vain

I personally don't like the term psi, wave form sequences coupled with particle duality, makes up most definitions of psi. However you also have reality positional variance, reversal symmetry, quantum entanglement, and other minor influences. I think the term psi is quite diminishing. It makes it seem like it's a separate material.

Re: Possible

True, but all energy is technically made up of the same stuff, it's just different vibrations or forms of it. I personally like to think of psi as a particle that takes the form of a wave, and that it's vibration rate is close to our brain's, but it's outside the normal physical spectrum.

Re: Possible

[quote="Arcwell"]
True, but all energy is technically made up of the same stuff, it's just different vibrations or forms of it. I personally like to think of psi as a particle that takes the form of a wave, and that it's vibration rate is close to our brain's, but it's outside the normal physical spectrum.
[/quote]

Note that psi is a "subtle energy" and not a "physical energy." That is to say, assuming that psi functions in the same way that "energy" of the kind spoken of in physics is not precisely wise. Calling psi an energy is a bit of a misnomer.

You are taking a few leaps in logic that you might want to think about. Note that I am not saying that you are wrong (you do after all only say that it is what you like to think of it as), but that is not something that is currently known.

Re: Possible

[quote="Arcwell"]
True, but all energy is technically made up of the same stuff, it's just different vibrations or forms of it. I personally like to think of psi as a particle that takes the form of a wave, and that it's vibration rate is close to our brain's, but it's outside the normal physical spectrum.
[/quote]

yeah, but i find nothing really points to the fact that "psi" could be its own separate material. Particle duality explains most manipulation based skills, while quantum entanglement explains esp based skills. In the terms of Occam's razor, there is not a need for psi to be a separate material, being that existing quantum laws justify its existence as more of a technique of manipulating waves.

I don't think it so much to be a separate material, but rather a means of imbuing existing particles with wave forms sequences. Thinking of it this way allows more flexibility, due to the degree of abundance it suggests. With that, even the fabric of space is subject to waves. If it was a separate particle, the particle would have to be present at the time. It just doesn't seem quite right in my eyes.

That is how I see it anyway.

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
psionics