DMILS

Chromosomal DNA is not changed via DMILS and mRNA and various polypeptide sequences seems to be changed in regards to actions in which the goal directly impacts the behavior of the cell, and tissue, in regards to such things as growth. Changes via DMILS seem to follow changes in the history describing the biological state of the organism, it seems, thereby skewing future outcomes and histories. Take, for example, if the goal is to regenerate some type of tissue. Injection of physical information describing the desired state/outcome is inserted via some mind-matter connection which skews the histories of the present moment leading to the future moment. Technically, the past is not the present and the present not the future, so one is not changing the past, per ce, one is changing the history of the object redirecting it to the desired/inserted probable, and future outcome.

That being said, in DMILS, the history describing the biological state of the organism is skewed in relation to that probable future outcome. If the goal is to kill the organism, processes leading to that happening would be skewed leading to its death. This generally would not, but could, include genetic changes. From my observations, stuff like changes in growth, metabolism, etc. via DMILS is tied to changes in polypeptides and mRNA and not chromosomal DNA. This form of DMILS can be, more or less, thought of as a form of psychokinesis on biological systems.   

There are a lot of interesting biological oddities and implications when one gets into DMILS.

Chromosomal DNA is found in the chromosomes which are tied to the overall genome which is tied to the phenotype which include eye color. mRNA is, generally, a sequence of RNA molecules which instruct the ribosomes to produce polypeptides, proteins. In the cell, these protein sequences generally act as general instructions which have an impact on the behaviors of the cell. In goals which tie directly into manipulation of cells within tissues, this is what is generally impacted.

Chromosomal DNA is important in cellular replication and the overtall traits of the organism whereas smaller protein sequences, from RNA translating sites of DNA, are tied to behaviors and receptors in the cells.

Mythological examples for DMILS are the "Doppelgangers", aka Shapeshifters.

Cobalt.

There are a lot of good research articles about this in google scholar.

[quote="metalforever"]
There are a lot of good research articles about this in google scholar.
[/quote]

It would be like trying to truly appreciate Bach with no clue as to the underlying concepts of theme, pitch, loudness, keys, etc. How can anyone truly understand the significance if they are not familiar with the basics of how the thing, itself, operates. Try this:

[url=http://www.esp.org/books/sturt/history/readbook.html]A History of Genetics[/url]

That is a basic book on the history of classical genetics.

Try this website for more in depth information:

[url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/]The National Center for Biotechnology[/url]

[url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=hmg]Human Molecular Genetics 2[/url]

How can you understand DMILS if you do not understand the biological systems, itself? Of course PK is teleological, but, still, if anyone wants to understand what it teleologically does, one would have to understand the basis of the basic sciences at least.

This is correct.

I find DMILS one of the most interesting applications of psychokinesis.